Underplayed Gems
The whole movie catalogue

Films and series, searchable by what they are

← Back to the shop

What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2004)

What the Bleep Do We Know!? poster
Original title
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?
Directed by
William Arntz, Mark Vicente, Betsy Chasse
Genre
comedy drama, science fiction film
Country
United States
Runtime
1h 48m
Rated
14
Rating
5.2 of 10 from 132 voters
Elsewhere
IMDb

How it feels

A photographer struggles with her everyday life and emotional problems. She encounters ideas from quantum physics and consciousness through interviews and animation. The film blends her fictional story with documentary elements to explore whether our minds shape reality.

quirkyphilosophicalthought-provokingwhimsicalcontemplativeunorthodoxdocufictionatmospheric

What happens

What the Bleep Do We Know!? (stylized as What tнē #$*! D̄ө ωΣ (k)πow!? and What the #$*! Do We Know!?) is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness (as part of a belief system known as quantum mysticism). The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Her experiences are offered by the creators to illustrate the film's scientifically unsupported ideas. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who serves as co-director along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. (from Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)

Trailer

More like this

This page is from Underplayed Gems. Not quite it? Tell the Catbot what you feel like watching and it picks from the whole catalogue, or browse by genre, country and year.

Lists: Korean thrillers worth the evening · Anime films beyond Studio Ghibli · Slow films for a rainy night · Horror that unsettles instead of startling · Series you can finish in a weekend · Nordic crime worth the subtitles · Good films that end in under 90 minutes · Documentaries that play like thrillers

Loading movies…

What should I watch?